E rangahau ana koe i te aha?What would you like to search for?

An assessment of the Rural Housing Programme 2001-2005/06: A synthesis of evaluation findings.

Author Category Source

Housing New Zealand Corporation, ,

Published Year Read Publication

This report evaluates the Rural Housing Programme (RHP) in Northland, East Coast, and Eastern Bay of Plenty from 2001 to 2006.

Initially ambitious, the RHP aimed to eradicate sub-standard housing in these areas, focusing on health and safety risks. Although participants reported improved well-being, the program faced significant challenges in delivery, resource allocation, and maintaining a cross-sectoral approach. The report reveals underestimation of housing issues, operational and policy inadequacies, and difficulties in transitioning from immediate response to sustainable housing solutions. More specifically, as the report explains, the programme faced significant under delivery issues due to unclear resource allocation and a deviation from its intended cross-sectoral approach, focusing instead on health and safety issues. Operational challenges were evident in Housing New Zealand Corporation’s (HNZC) struggle to transition from immediate response to sustainable housing models and from direct delivery to community-based approaches. This necessitated a substantial restructuring of systems and policies, which was not adequately executed. The evaluation revealed several lessons, including the importance of organisational support for complex programmes, actualising inter-sectoral collabourations, ensuring appropriate programme placement within organisations, maintaining robust information platforms, and establishing transparent resource and financial systems. It highlighted the necessity of linking inputs, outputs, and outcomes, responding to identified risks, and maintaining programme stability. It underscores the importance of robust policy support, inter-agency collabouration, and tailored, flexible solutions for community needs. To enhance the programme’s effectiveness, the report suggests establishing a clear targeting regime, setting transparent repair standards, collecting robust data on housing conditions, offering a flexible range of assistance, and ensuring collaboration at both policy and operational levels. Despite its potential, the RHP’s effectiveness was limited by these operational and policy challenges, underscoring the need for a more coherent, well-supported, and collaborative approach in future rural housing initiatives. Despite intentions, the RHP was largely reactive, losing sight of its preventive and sustainability goals, suggesting a need for reevaluation and strategic realignment to effectively address rural housing issues. Saville-Smith and Wehipeihana deliver a significant report over 100 pages that provides an in depth focus on the history of the RHP, the data used to evaluate the RHP, how the RHP evolved during its rollout, the delivery process, the targeting of the RHP, and the outcomes.

Go back to the Annotated Bibliography List